Chat with us, powered by LiveChat
Menu

Bank CEOs Are Confused About Environmental Racism

Environmental Racism
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

EDITOR NOTE: What can you say when a system necessarily has to marginalize certain things in order to elevate others. There is no system that can elevate everything at once. At the same, this is no excuse for certain injustices to remain perpetual and systemic (as ironic as that sounds), whether it's allowing the poorest of a population to live in (sometimes undisclosed) toxic environmental zones, or whether 90% of American households should be subject to suffering the effect of the Federal Reserve’s monetary manipulations. The solution, however, may not always be found in federal regulation. It’s about constantly negotiating a balance. And oftentimes, these negotiations should be handled locally, if at all possible. The risk of federalizing such an issue like environmental racism is that the government may take coercive measures that end up yielding anti-productive outcomes. We see this all the time. But once that “optionality” of balance through negotiation is frozen, as is the case when the government establishes complete centralization and control, then you may no longer have a functional democracy.

Rashida Tlaib: “I just want to ask one by one, yes or no, are you familiar with the term ‘environmental racism’?” Bank CEOs: “Vaguely,” “Only vaguely,” “No.”

The CEOs of the largest banks in the U.S. have only the vaguest idea of what “environmental racism” means, even as their companies invest hundreds of billions of dollars in oil and gas projects whose pollution often falls hardest on communities of color.

That’s one revealing takeaway from a recent House Financial Services Committee hearing, where some of the most powerful financial executives in the world faced hard questions about the human impacts of fossil fuel production from progressive Democratic lawmakers. 

“I just want to ask one by one, yes or no, are you familiar with the term ‘environmental racism’?” said Rep. Rashida Tlaib, whose Michigan district includes a majority-Black area of southwest Detroit where residents breathe some of the worst air in the state. 

“Vaguely, yes,” replied JP Morgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, who last year took a knee in solidarity with the Black Lives Matter movement.  

“Only vaguely; I don’t know the specific definition of it,” said Citigroup CEO Jane Fraser, who according to Bloomberg is attempting to turn her bank into an “antiracist institution.” 

“No, I’m not,” said Morgan Stanley CEO James Gorman, who in the wake of the police murder of George Floyd last year wrote in an internal email that “the pain, fear, sadness and anger felt by the black community, and also by the vast majority of people globally, is palpable.”

Neither Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan, Wells Fargo CEO Charles Scharf, or Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon, all of whom have made commitments to fighting racial injustice over the past year, could not provide a definition either. 

“You all should know and be familiar with the term environmental racism because for generations, Black, brown, and Indigenous communities have seen the fossil fuel corporations use your banks to finance and construct oil and gas refineries, petrochemical plants, and pipeline projects,” Tlaib said. “It has literally left us with high rates of asthma, cancer—countless families have lost their loved ones too soon because they were forced to breathe the polluted air your banks financed.”

Tlaib gave as example the Marathon Refinery, a 250-acre oil processing facility and tank farm near the Boynton neighborhood of Detroit, which has received 15 violation notices from the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy for pollution since 2013. The area, which includes more than two-dozen industrial sites, is 71 percent Black. 

Detroit is the 10th worst metro area in the country when it comes to asthma attacks for Black children, which a 2017 report from the NAACP and other groups said is linked to oil and gas exposure.  

About 56 percent of health-harming air emissions from oil refineries land hardest on people of color, an April report from Greenpeace and the Movement for Black Lives calculated, despite non-white communities being 39 percent of the overall population.

“These polluting projects haven’t been built in wealthy neighborhoods, as you all know. They have been built on land and front-line communities of color, contaminated our air, polluting our water for generations to come,” Tlaib said. 

The six CEOs at the hearing lead financial institutions that together have invested over $1.1 trillion in fossil fuels since the 2015 Paris climate agreement, according to a recent report from several environmental groups entitled Banking on Climate Chaos. 

“They may be only ‘vaguely aware; of the name, but bankers clearly know about environmental racism—they lent the money to build the pipelines and chemical plants that endanger people's lives,” environmentalist and author Bill McKibben told VICE News. “You don’t get a Cancer Alley for free: it takes a banker, willing to overlook health and safety in the name of quicker, higher returns.”

When the bank CEOs were asked by Tlaib if any of them live near an oil refinery, all of them replied “no.”

Original post from ViceNews

Bank Failure Scenario Kit - sm2

GET YOUR FREE

BANK FAILURE SCENARIO KIT

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

All articles are provided as a third party analysis and do not necessarily reflect the explicit views of GSI Exchange and should not be construed as financial advice.

Precious Metals and Currency Data Powered by nFusion Solutions