Chat with us, powered by LiveChat

Biden Focuses on Cultivating Relationships With Asian Economies

John Galt

Updated: April 19, 2022

medical psychadelic series
Editor’s Note:

EDITOR'S NOTE: The optimism that once accompanied globalization has now revealed its ugly side as geopolitical conflicts in Eastern Europe reshape how we view the price of inter-connectedness. Despite confusion regarding Biden’s Indo-Pacific Economic Framework, his new project has probably little to do with the kind of utopian globalism heralded in the 1990s. It appears more like an aggressive and old-fashioned territory grab by economic means. China’s exclusion makes this evident. It even goes beyond the notion of “counterbalance,” as the author describes. Biden’s move toward Asian economies is an attempt to disrupt China’s global expansion. Is it a smart move? That depends on the content of the framework itself. Right now, lawmakers on both sides of the fence see the framework as strategically lacking, according to a report published by The Hill. And Asian countries willing to join see it as empty “virtue signaling” with no real commitment to the East. So, are we about to see yet another strike for the Biden Administration; a testament to his ineptitude as president?

President Biden is putting Asian economies at the center of a new economic accord, at a time when globalization has become anathema, and geopolitical tensions are reshaping the world order.

Why it matters: Regional heavyweights like India, Australia, Japan, and South Korea are linchpins in the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF), which (at least for now) has pointedly excluded China.

  • The administration is seeking new regional alliances and fortifying old ones, but those ambitions face an uphill climb.

By the numbers: Two-way trade between the U.S. and the region totaled $1.75 trillion in 2020, according to White House estimates, with American foreign direct investment just shy of $1 trillion.

  • The other side: According to the Center for Strategic International Studies (CSIS), some constituents are worried about the “optics” of not including Beijing.
  • Even worse, “partners in the region remain perplexed over what the IPEF is and what it seeks to do,” the CSIS wrote in a recent analysis.

The big picture: The bilateral U.S-China relationship is tense for a number of reasons, with grievances over trade and technology topping the list.

  • The new framework is designed in part to cultivate new allies, and counterbalance China, but it's already coming under bipartisan fire for being insufficiently clear or ambitious.

What they’re saying: Trade isn’t just about the flow of goods and services anymore. In a global economy increasingly reliant on advanced technology, Biden has an opportunity to craft rules “based on safety, security, and transparency, argues IBM vice chair Gary Cohn.

  • In an opinion piece shared with Axios, the ex-Goldman Sachs banker turned White House economist called the framework “a good start” that needs more muscle – and a laser-focus on data security and intellectual property.
  • “Without the certainty of clear, legal obligations, countries will be free to ignore its elements on a whim as different governing constituencies come to power,” he added.

Yes, but: Some Asian economies are concerned efforts will only involve “the usual suspects” while excluding other key countries.

  • “These partners view the success of the IPEF as hinging on the extent to which the United States can attract developing countries from Southeast Asia, South Asia, and the Pacific,” the CSIS said.

The bottom line: Asia is strategically critical, America needs all the friends in the region it can get, and many countries are committed in principle. But a flawed rollout may spoil the IPEF's chances before it even begins.

Originally published on Axios.

No Investment Advice

GSI Exchange is a publisher and precious metals retailer. You understand and agree that no content published on the Site constitutes a recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction, or investment strategy is suitable or advisable for any specific person. You understand that the Content on the Site is provided for information purposes only, and none of the information contained on the Site constitutes an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell a security. You understand that the GSI Exchange receives neither monetary or securities compensation for our services. GSI stands to benefit from the sell of retail cost precious metals on this site. To avoid hidden costs all prices are listed live 24/7 on this site. Read the full disclaimer

2022 Info Kit



Precious Metals and Currency Data Powered by nFusion Solutions