Chat with us, powered by LiveChat

Dems Push For Excessive Capital Requirements On U.S. Banks

capitalist or a socialist
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

EDITOR NOTE: To ensure that all Americans receive their fair share of opportunity and prosperity, the government must step in and regulate all aspects of the American Dream. That way it can control the outcome. Today, our liberal leaders in Washington seek to impose tighter capital requirements and regulations on banks. Tomorrow, it will be aimed at your money, lifestyle, and eventually your personal freedom. It’s a little confusing because, despite their coercive actions to enforce accountability, they choose not to apply the same standards to monetary and fiscal policy--two of the biggest factors that have led to America’s great wealth divide. Of course, facing the truth would mean fewer funds funneled into their ideologically-driven programs and pockets. On the other hand, an elitist platform to control the flow of all currency across industries to individual households seems more favorable. After all, from their perspective, Americans are not smart enough to manage their own endeavors. The government clearly underestimates the capacity of Americans to refuse and act against this elitist narrative--namely, those who purchase non-CUSIP gold and silver to “short” the monetary debasement it tries to impose on us. Not everyone buys the government's solution to current problems; rather viewing the government itself as the problem, as President Reagan said nearly half a century ago.

Two senior Democratic lawmakers have warned the Federal Reserve and other US regulators that it would be a “big mistake” to extend the more flexible capital requirements that were introduced for US banks at the start of the pandemic.

The intervention of Elizabeth Warren, the U.S. Senator from Massachusetts and former Democratic presidential candidate, and Sherrod Brown, the Ohio Senator who chairs the Senate Banking Committee, intensified a political battle over the rules over lenient, which must expire at the end. of the month.

In a letter viewed by the Financial Times, Warren and Brown said that continued capital relief for the financial sector would “significantly” weaken the stricter regulatory framework that was put in place in the decade after the last. global financial crisis.

The letter from two of the most influential Liberal lawmakers in Congress overseeing Wall Street comes as the Fed, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency must decide whether or not to extend a temporary rule change to the ratio of additional leverage. , which was introduced in April of last year.

The SLR requires large banks to have capital equal to at least 3 percent of their assets, or 5 percent for larger systemically important institutions.

Regulators relaxed the rules early in the pandemic over fears that balance sheet constraints hamper banks’ ability to intervene to stabilize volatile financial markets and lend to struggling businesses and consumers. The Fed has allowed major banks to temporarily exclude holdings of US Treasuries and cash on hand at the central bank from their assets when calculating the SLR.

The looming deadline has amplified a political split over the issue, with Republicans, banks and industry executives pushing for an extension of the measures while Democrats call for their expiration.

“You and your predecessors of your independent regulatory agencies have succumbed to political pressure to weaken these key reforms, creating new risks for the economy and the financial system,” Warren and Brown wrote to regulators on Friday. “Extending this exemption from capital requirements at the level of the bank or the holding company would be a serious mistake.”

Banks have warned that failure to extend relief could make it more difficult for them to absorb the deluge of liquidity the Fed is pumping into the financial system as well as making it easier to trade in U.S. government debt. They also said it could limit their ability to extend credit to cash-strapped businesses and consumers.

Jenn Piepszak, chief financial officer of JPMorgan Chase, said in January that if SLR relief was halted this month, the bank could also “avoid” taking new deposits, among other measures.

Some Republican lawmakers, who sided with the banks, urged Fed Chairman Jay Powell to clarify the rule during congressional hearings last week. South Dakota Sen. Mike Rounds urged Powell to keep an “open mind” when considering what he sees as “excessive and difficult capital requirements.”

Congresswoman Ann Wagner of Missouri also called for an extension of the exemption, noting concerns that the “arbitrary” removal of the exclusion could put “additional pressure” on the US government debt market. 

Warren and Brown accused the banks of using the pandemic as an “excuse” to weaken post-crisis regulatory reforms and instead called on them to increase capital levels by cutting dividends and buybacks.

“It is inexcusable to provide Wall Street with deregulated capital exemptions while allowing them to pay out tens of billions of dollars in capital each quarter,” they wrote.

Powell said last week that the U.S. central bank has yet to make a decision on the SLR.

Regarding Warren and Brown’s letter, a Fed spokesperson said, “We have received the letter and plan to respond to it.”

The FDIC and OCC did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Originally posted on Olt News

Bank Failure Scenario Kit - sm2



  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

All articles are provided as a third party analysis and do not necessarily reflect the explicit views of GSI Exchange and should not be construed as financial advice.

Precious Metals and Currency Data Powered by nFusion Solutions