Chat with us, powered by LiveChat

Exploring the Political Dimension of Inflation

Derek Wolfe

Updated: January 15, 2023

Brainard inflation
Editor’s Note:

EDITOR'S NOTE: Senator Elizabeth Warren joined the “transitory” bandwagon in the months before inflation broke out. Now, she’s publicly announcing her position against higher rate hikes because, as we all know, the latest inflation data tells us that prices have peaked. If only such forecasts were certain. The political handling of the inflation topic among Democrats tells us one of two things: either most Dems are completely clueless with all things economic, or they’re in the know and gaslighting the American public against its best interests because it’s what their constitutions want to hear (if guarantees they’ll continue working as career politicians). Either way, it’s bad luck for all Americans, left or right. 

By Peter Tchir of Academy Securities

This morning, I can’t help but wonder about Tesla cutting prices on some models (first in China and then domestically) and the off-the-charts cancellations builders are facing.  But that could wait until this weekend’s report.

What can’t wait until this weekend is the messaging, I’m seeing related to inflation.

On the “political” front:

  • Senator Warren (@SenWarren) tweeted: "Inflation has slowed for six months, providing families more breathing room. The Fed needs to take this data into account and not drive the economy off a cliff with more extreme interest rate hikes."

  • Let’s remember that this was all “transitory” until amongst other things, President Biden and Chair Powell sat down in November 2021 to discuss his renomination.

On the “media” front:

  • There is a “victory lap” sort of reporting. It is almost as though mainstream media got fed the talking points that “7.1% is bad! But 6.5% is good”. We are “winning” the war. It is headed in right direction, etc. Do NOT underestimate how much mainstream media is influenced via talking points to influence the public. Almost feels to me like we are setting up for a shift in how inflation is treated.

  • Nick Timiraos (@NickTimiraos) is writing about and tweeting about annualizing the Q4 data! (Where have we seen that before? From 2 + 2 =5 on December 15th) Whether true or not, many view him as the person in the press closest to this Fed, so it is interesting to see what narrative he is helping shape for the more specialized audience (financial media as opposed to mainstream media).

I am still neutral, but this shift in political and media talking points could pave the way for a series of Fed speakers to come out downplaying the inflation risk.

That would make me want to get on the bull one more time as that would fuel, likely erroneously, but fuel nonetheless, another big “soft landing” surge in stock prices (with a good rally in the front/belly of the yield curve).


Originally published at ZeroHedge

No Investment Advice

GSI Exchange is a publisher and precious metals retailer. You understand and agree that no content published on the Site constitutes a recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction, or investment strategy is suitable or advisable for any specific person. You understand that the Content on the Site is provided for information purposes only, and none of the information contained on the Site constitutes an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell a security. You understand that the GSI Exchange receives neither monetary or securities compensation for our services. GSI stands to benefit from the sell of retail cost precious metals on this site. To avoid hidden costs all prices are listed live 24/7 on this site. Read the full disclaimer

GSI Exchange Infokit - evergreen



Precious Metals and Currency Data Powered by nFusion Solutions