EDITOR NOTE: Eight big banks are about to get sued by Baltimore and Philadelphia for colluding in an antitrust-like scheme, forcing them to pay inflated interest rates on tax-exempt muni bonds. It’s a little complicated, as financial instruments often can be. The thing about it is that the city and state in the suit have been in dire fiscal straits since well before the pandemic. The banks’ actions certainly add to the (soon to be) plaintiffs’ predicament, but again, we know that banks are not to be trusted. The same thing can be said of certain municipal investments. If you live in a city or state on the verge of bankruptcy, perhaps consider hedging your wealth with a much simpler instrument that won’t get mired in the complications of a banking or municipal collapse?
NEW YORK (Reuters) - A federal judge on Monday said Philadelphia and Baltimore may sue eight big banks for allegedly conspiring to force state and local governments to pay inflated interest rates on a popular type of tax-exempt municipal bond.
U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman in Manhattan said the cities may pursue antitrust claims in the proposed class action over the banks’ marketing of variable-rate demand obligations, once a more than $400 billion market, from 2008 to 2016.
Philadelphia and Baltimore said the collusion reduced available funding for hospitals, power and water supplies, schools, transportation and other essential municipal services.
The defendants included affiliates of Bank of America Corp BAC.N, Barclays Plc BARC.L, Citigroup Inc C.N, Goldman Sachs Group Inc GS.N, JPMorgan Chase & Co JPM.N, Morgan Stanley MS.N, Royal Bank of Canada RY.TO and Wells Fargo & Co WFC.N.
VRDOs are long-term bonds with short-term interest rates that typically reset weekly. Investors may redeem the bonds early, and banks must remarket those bonds to other investors at the lowest possible rates.