# Simple Explanation to America’s Inflation Problem

EDITOR NOTE: If you’ve lived at least two decades, you understand how the “normal” inflation rate makes things gradually more expensive over time (and prices never go backward, at least hardly ever; they never “deflate”). So the cost of a candy bar today “must” be relatively the same as it was, say, back in the early 1970s considering the total cost of living back then, average income, etc., right? If you assume so, you might want to do some research and make a few calculations yourself. Things are actually more expensive--not just in terms of nominal value, but in “real” value--than they were then. Packages of goods have also shrunk while their costs, relative to the size of goods in the package, have risen. Yet the amount of gold and silver required to buy the same goods--comparing then to now--has shown that the metals’ values have either kept pace with or outpaced altogether the cost of the goods. This tells us that the dollar’s decline is much more significant than it appears. The real value behind the prices is distorted and obscure. And behind it all a simple explanation--conjuring the “lies” hidden beneath the “figures”--is the Federal Reserve.

“I’m dealing with it as a landlord. Can’t get parts and materials and can’t get labor. Both cost more than ever. Plumbers at \$300 per hour. AC guys closer to \$500 per.”

Small Business Optimism Drops on Labor Shortage and Inflation Worries

The National Federation of Independent Business Optimism Index dropped two-tenths of a point to a reading of 99.6 in May. This followed three straight monthly increases but was the second straight month in which results undershot expectations.

And more inflation sightings from our dear readers…

Stephen G.:

The MSRP of a 1964 Ford Mustang was \$2,368 and an ounce of gold was pegged at \$35.10, which works out to a little over 66 ounces of gold. Today, 66 ounces of gold will buy you two BMW Z4s, with almost \$20K left over. I think this says as much about the destruction of the dollar as it does about gold as a store of value.

I also remember buying gasoline back in the early ’60s for right around 20 cents a gallon. I remember being struck by the fact that a gallon of gas and a pack of smokes were about the same price. So two silver dimes would buy a gallon of gas in 1963. And, guess what, two silver dimes will still buy a gallon of gas – with change – back in some parts of the country. And that’s just going by the spot price of silver, not the huge premiums being charged on eBay and most other sellers.

Fred T.:

At the real day-to-day level, inflation is rampant. We get Chinese on Thursday nights. Last Thursday, when I picked up the order, I got a severe case of sticker shock. They had raised the price of their entrees 40% – from \$9.99 to \$14. Unbelievable. They said their food costs have skyrocketed. Trust me, it is not transient. The price will never be reduced.

And Goku V.:

Take a butterfinger. In 1978, it was 4 ozs and cost 10 cents in a vending machine in grade school. By 1993, it was down to 3.4 ozs and cost 25 cents. The last time I saw one, it cost \$1.69 and was 1.51 ozs.

Take the snack pack of butterfingers. When they came out, they were 10 oz bars for 99 cents. At their cheapest, they were 12 x 1 oz bars for 88 cents at Walmart. Today, they are over \$3 and are down to 6 x 55 oz bars. Do the math!

## Confusing and Misleading

Here at the Diary, we don’t really care what things cost… how much people earn… or what interest rate they get on their savings.

All that matters is that these figures be true. Then, people can take the “information content” of the prices and make their choices.

The trouble – speaking as though we were a serious economist – is that today’s prices, wages, and interest rates all lie.

The information content – bent and distorted by the Federal Reserve’s fake money – is false. It confuses us. It misleads us. It creates bubbles and BS.

Here, we make a small effort to straighten it out.

## False Argument

Many times, in these pages, we have pointed out that a new car or a new house is much more expensive today than it used to be.

But the price alone – twisted up by the feds – tells us nothing. We have to adjust it for “inflation.”

We can do that, as our dear reader did above, quoting the price in real money – gold or silver.

Or, we can figure it in time – how many working hours it would take to earn enough to purchase said house or car.

Either way, the real price comes out at two to three times more than it was in the 1970s.

Then, the apologists for the fake-money system tell us that we’re wrong. We’ve failed to take product improvements into account, they say. “A car today is a lot better than one in the 1970s.”

The Bureau of Labor Statistics actually adjusts auto prices downward to reflect quality enhancements.

But this argument is false. Technological improvements can make a car better (or worse). But they also should reduce the expense of making it.

The two costs – producer and consumer – should change at more or less the same rate. So there’s no reason to think a Ford F-150 should cost more in 2021 than one in 1971.

## Higher Wages

Another reason you might think today’s car is more expensive than one from 50 years ago is that wages are so much higher.

A person working somewhere on the auto supply chain in 1971 would have earned an average of about \$3.60 an hour. Today, he’s earning nearly \$25 an hour.

But wait. We need to adjust for “inflation.”

And when we do that, our colleague David Stockman tells us that the typical employee in the manufacturing sector hit his peak earnings in 1978. Here we are, 43 years later, and his real, inflation-adjusted wages have gone down 6%.

No wonder he wanted to Make America Great Again; he remembered when wages actually went up. He must feel he’s been cheated over the last 40 years, even if he has no idea how the flimflam worked.

And he’s right. However much auto prices have gone up, none of that money went into his pocket.

## Cheated Again

At the top of the money pyramid, the elites have stocks and bonds. An increase in stock prices – even if it is a phony increase, caused by the Fed’s money-printing – can bring them additional wealth.

But most people rely on their time to pay the bills. They sell it, hour by hour, week by week, year by year.

And while the Fed continues to buy financial assets at a rate of \$120 billion per month… it has never paid a penny for a working man’s time.

Stocks and bonds go up. Wages do not.

Still, if he works hard and is careful about saving his money, an assembly-line worker may build up some capital of his own. Were he to save, say, \$2,000 every year over a 40-year career of putting nuts and bolts together, he would have \$80,000! And then, he could earn interest on it.

Alas, the interest rate has been falsified, too. Adjusted for inflation, had he put his money in a savings account in 2008, he’d have less money today than he had then.

This year alone, based on the present inflation readings, on \$80,000 of savings, he’d lose another \$2,000.

Cheated again!

## Simple Solution

And now… with the official “inflation” rate over 5% (annualized, based on the first quarter), the feds are busily figuring out how to keep the scam going.

“It’s complicated,” they say… which is surely true, thanks to the many curve balls they’ve thrown.

But behind the complexity is the simple Quantity Theory of Money (QTM). This tells us that the more money is in circulation, the higher prices will go.

When economist Milton Friedman proposed the fake-dollar system (what was he thinking?!), he said the Fed should increase the supply of dollars at a rate roughly equal to the rate of GDP growth.

That way, the quantity of money would go up at about the same rate as the supply of goods and services. No surprises. No shortage of liquidity. No fear of inflation or deflation. And no price distortion.

Oh happy day!

## Simple Explanation

Friedman set 3–5% as the perfect rate. But that was when the economy really was growing at a 3% rate.

Over the last 14 years, the real rate of GDP growth – adjusted for inflation – was under 1.3%. So even a 3% increase in the supply of money would be twice as much as it should be.

But guess how much the money supply (the Fed’s balance sheet) grew last year. Five percent? Ten percent? More?

Oh Dear Reader, you already know. Seventy eight percent, March 2020 to March 2021.

The number is so staggering, we can hardly believe it ourselves.

So let us set aside the Plague Year as exceptional in every way, and go back to the turn of the century.

Well… since this century began, U.S. GDP has gone up from about \$10 trillion to about \$22 trillion. A solid double.

But the Fed’s balance sheet? Around \$700 billion 20 years ago, if it had kept pace with GDP growth, it would be around \$1.5 trillion today.

Instead, it’s now around \$8 trillion – five times where it should be.

If we were looking for a simple explanation of inflation, need we look any further?

Original post from RogueEconomics

### BANK FAILURE SCENARIO KIT

• This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

All articles are provided as a third party analysis and do not necessarily reflect the explicit views of GSI Exchange and should not be construed as financial advice.