Just last month, George Soros donated a whopping $18 Billion to the Open Society Foundation.
Originally founded by Soros in 1993 to support pro-Clinton groups and Super PAC’s, the Open Society Foundation currently funds multiple left-wing and Antifa groups--radical organizations such as Black Lives Matter, Al-Haq, and Gisha (pro-Palestinian group) among others. More importantly, Open Society is an organization that, under the guise of “philanthropy,” bankrolls select left-wing groups to directly or indirectly do Soros’ bidding; each group serving as the social arm of Soros’ political and ideological agenda.
‘The Open Society Foundation may have initiated the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists’ efforts toward leaking the Paradise Papers--also known as “Soros-Leaks.”
The Paradise Papers is a massive leak- of approximately 13.4 million financial documents exposing the offshore investments of high-profile individuals, companies, and heads of state. Among those exposed are the British Royal Family (Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Charles), top members of President Trump’s administration (Wilbur Ross and Rex Tillerson), and a number of top ranking Chinese officials. Yet Soros and his hedge fund benefitted tremendously from offshore investments and operations beyond the jurisdiction of US financial regulators.
So what’s the motivation behind the leak? According to Ivan Danilov, an economist, financial and political analyst writing for RIA Novosti, “If one compiles a list of politicians and organizations that have been recently subjected to media attacks from the Soros-funded consortium — that can rightly be called ‘Soros-Leaks’ — it would turn out that it is almost entirely comprised of those who stood in the way of the magnate.”
In short, having gained notoriety decades ago as The Man Who Broke the Bank of England, Soros is now using his pool of unlimited wealth to extend his operations in punishing and destabilizing any individual, institution, or government standing in the way of his radical leftist agenda.
Let’s back up and ask: Who is George Soros, and why is he such a menace?
Soros is a successful financier and investor who has a history of profiting off the demise of cultures and economies. His wealth and status give him the power to move markets on a global scale by simply giving an opinion, and he can destabilize nations by manipulating their currency.
To many, he seems like a walking contradiction. On one hand, he’s a liberal philanthropist who has given away millions to people and organizations in need. On the other hand, he’s a profiteer who ruthlessly destroys institutions and governments for monetary gain.
Yet Soros is NOT a contradiction. He is both creator and destroyer; philanthropist and raider. These dual personas make sense when viewed in light of two attributes present in both sides of his operation: first, the motivation to seize and express power--financially, ideologically, and politically; and second, the absence of human compassion to obtain “profits”--monetary capital, “social” capital, political capital--at the expense of others, not all of whom are “enemies,” but impersonal “counterparties” who happen to be on the losing side of his “trade.”
To get a clearer picture of who George Soros is, take it from his own words. Here’s an excerpt from an interview that he tried to ban, perhaps after having second thoughts on the truths that it exposed.
In Nazi-occupied Hungary via 1944, George Soros, a Hungarian Jew himself, posed as Christian living under the protection of a Nazi-collaborationist official working for Hungary’s Ministry of Agriculture.
Soros, posing as the official’s godson, accompanied and assisted the official who confiscated the properties of fellow Hungarian Jews, many of whom were shipped-off to concentration camps.
The interviewer asks Soros if such an experience traumatized him; if perhaps, Soros felt the slightest ounce of guilt. He asked Soros, “was it difficult?” Soros’ response is shocking.
“Uh...Not at all...maybe as a child you don’t see the connection...but it created no problem at all..”
Let’s stop here and ask, how can a 14-year old not see the connection between the confiscation of property and the sending off of entire families to death camps to the moral depravity of assisting in such an act. Wouldn’t a decent human being feel the slightest “guilt” for facilitating these actions? Instead, “it created no problem at all.”
When asked again if he felt any sense of wrong doing or, at the least, internal conflict (perhaps the interviewer was giving Soros an opportunity to redeem himself from his previous comments), Soros continued:
“No...well, of course I could be on the other side...I could be the one from whom [something] was being taken away...but...there was no sense that I shouldn’t be there...well, actually, in a funny way...it’s just like in markets...if I wasn’t there...because I wasn’t doing it...somebody else would have been taking it away anyhow...whether I was there or not, I was only a spectator...so, I have no role in taking away that property...so I had no sense of guilt.”
Perhaps the interviewer should have asked whether Soros felt any compassion rather than trying to nail him on the matter of guilt. But if anyone felt the slightest compassion for his/her fellow citizens, would it be possible not to feel the slightest guilt or conflict for participating in such actions?
For Soros, assisting in the confiscation of property fellow Hungarian Jews, whether directly or indirectly, in exchange for his life was, according to him, not an unfortunate necessity, but something analogous to a “market transaction.” Such a view reduces human suffering to the impersonal fluctuations of market prices.
And his entire history consistently exhibits this view of human existence--one that reduces it to mere machinations of a market process, enabling him to profit off the demise or people, institutions, and nations with absolutely no feeling of guilt.
To view the entire video, click here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SUdosc33eSE&t=633s
Most recently, Soros made a tremendous profit off the Las Vegas massacre. And that was just a mere sideshow to a much larger political strategy toward which he has been employing a massive network of proxies of Open Society-funded NGO’s. We see this taking place now in the EU.
In response, Hungary’s Anti-Soros campaign, spearheaded by Soros’ own former protege, Viktor Orban, now head of Hungary’s Fidesz party, attests to the lengths that Soros will go to subvert the operations of any party Soros considers “illiberal.”
Having received financing from Soros three decades ago to study in Britain, Orban’s slow drift toward conservative political values--particularly that of refusing the immigration of those with Islamic faith into Hungary in light of terrorism risks--prompted Soros to accuse Orban of transforming Hungary into a “Mafia state.”
Shall we assume, by extension, that any entity who holds values contrary to Soros’ political and profit-seeking agenda--those who want to protect their borders; those who want to protect themselves against central bank and government intervention and taxation (thus opening offshore accounts); those who prefer to champion conservative values against left-wing extremism--might be considered a “criminal”?
Conservative British politician and EU member, Nigel Farage, recently warned of Soros’ insidious “puppet-master” influence over members of the EU--what amounted to “the biggest level of international political collusion in history.”
Snippets of a video in which Farange’s outs Soros amidst EU members (via Breitbart):
“I just wonder when we’re talking about offshore money, when we’re talking about political subversion, when we’re talking about collusion, I wonder whether we’re looking in the wrong place.
“And I say that because George Soros recently gave Open Society, his organisation, which...campaigns for free movement of peoples and supports supranational structures like the European Union, he recently gave it 18 billion dollars.
“Open Society boasts that they had 42 forty-two meetings last year with the European Commission. They’ve even published a book of ‘reliable’ friends in the European Parliament and there are 226 names on that list — including yours, sir! I thought you’d find this interesting!” he told a heckling MEP.
“We even had last week [Guy] Verhofstadt lobbying on behalf of Mr. Soros, at the Conference of Presidents in a battle that is going on with Viktor Orbán, the Prime Minister of Hungary.”
“If we’re going to have a debate, and we’re going to talk about full political and financial transparency, well, let’s do it!
“So I shall be writing today to all 226 of you, asking some pretty fair questions:
“Have you ever received funds, directly or indirectly, from Open Society?
“How many of their events have you attended?
“I think this parliament should now set up a special committee to look into all of this,” he concluded.
“And I say this because I fear we could be looking at the biggest level of international political collusion in history.”
To view the complete video, click here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KV1oySUij9U
The bottom line is that Soros believes he has the power to transform certain parts of the world according to his left-wing vision. And for years, America has been one of his most important targets. He continues to use his wealth to fund activists (via his Open Society Foundation), education, media, and even ministers (evangelical and catholic puppets willing to implement an atheistic agenda) and government officials to destabilize and transform this country. And until Americans wake up to see Soros for what he truly is, this country may remain vulnerable to his insidious designs.