Chat with us, powered by LiveChat

The American People Deserve To Know Where Their Money Is Going

John Galt

Updated: April 1, 2022

global debt crisis
Editor’s Note:

EDITOR'S NOTE: Think of all the pharmaceutical ads you watch on TV. There are hundreds of them. When it comes to verbally disclosing the risks and negative side effects, ever notice how the voiceover is sped up and condensed to a point where you can’t really understand what the person is saying? The sad truth is that you weren’t meant to hear all of it. It doesn’t matter if it negatively affects you. And if you happen to purchase the medication, notice how small, long, and unreadable the content is. The disclosure, somehow meant for the customer, actually functions to protect the manufacturer. What does this have to do with Rand Paul’s article below? We see a similar disconnect in Congress. Biden’s omnibus spending package is 2,741 pages long. Did any of the members in the Senate actually have time to digest each page before coming to a vote? Similar to how the judicial process was meant not to seek truth but to put an efficient end to a case, can we assume that legislative proposals in voluminous form aren’t necessarily intended to disclose details but to bury them? If so, Rand Paul has a plan to bring transparency to this process of obfuscation. It goes without saying, it’s in Americans’ best interest for their representatives to actually read and understand what they’re voting for or against. It may, at the least, help disclose where American money is going.

Think Congress is full of speed readers? Voters expect lawmakers to know what we're voting on before we decide to spend their money.

Last week, the Senate voted on the 2,741-page omnibus spending package, clocking in at a whopping $1.5 trillion. It was released in the middle of the night, just hours before we were expected to vote on it.

Mind you, when we vote on things, we’re expected to know what we’re voting on. At least that’s the expectation of the folks we represent back home.

AMID SOARING INFLATION, SKYROCKETING GAS PRICES, CONGRESS BRINGS BACK EARMARKS: 'COCAINE OF THIS GENERATION'

But do you really think there is a single person in the United States who actually believes that Congress is filled with speed readers capable of digesting thousands of pages in a matter of hours? Probably not. But the big spenders of both parties in Washington love keeping that under wraps. In fact, they bank on it – literally and figuratively.

For what it’s worth, I have legislation in the Senate to fix the issue, a resolution to give members ample time to read the bills before they vote. It would also increase transparency and incentivize legislation to be shorter.

Just imagine! What if we had one day for every 20 pages to read the bills before they were brought up for a vote? We would have had 137 days to truly consider whether the American people’s hard-earned tax dollars were worthy of all the ridiculous spending items included in the recently passed omnibus.

We would have had 137 days for the general public to discover exactly what special favors, in the form of earmarks, were snuck in under the auspices of essential budgetary items.

Do you think $2.5 million for biking trails in Vermont is really a spending priority? What about $4.2 million for the U.S. Sheep Experiment Station or $1.6 million for the development of equitable growth of the shellfish aquaculture industry in Rhode Island? I’m not really sure what either of these things do, and why it would be deemed necessary to receive millions of taxpayer dollars.

These examples are just the tip of the iceberg. The spending bill included approximately 4,000 earmarks, worth between $8 and $10 billion. $569,000 for the removal of derelict lobster pots. $2 million to educate, digitally connect, and build roads for indigenous coffee producers in Columbia. $3 million for a fisherman co-op in Guam. $925,000 for a barn in Vermont. $750,000 for a sports complex in Las Vegas.

The American people deserve to know where their money is going.

$10 million to demolish a hotel in Alaska. $1 million for workforce training related to clean energy and green building in Minneapolis. $2 million for reducing inequity in access to solar power. I could go on.

At one point earmarks were banned, specifically because of how corrupt of a process it had become. But the big spenders in Congress brought them back under a new name. They call it "Community Project Funding," but we know it’s just the same old game plan: funnel tax dollars to special interests and campaign donors.

They said things would be different this time. They said by cloaking earmarks with a fancy name and requiring paltry standards like "evidence of community support," they’d be able to handle earmarks' calling cards – rampant waste, corruption, and abuse of taxpayers’ money. 

But as we’ve seen, the waste has already reared its ugly head. This is the same song as before, just a different verse. 

At one point last year, I had great hope for the end of earmarks. I was proud to join with my friend Sen. Mike Lee to urge our fellow GOP members to continue to uphold the earmark ban. Twenty of us signed a statement promising to "not participate in an inherently wasteful spending practice that is prone to serious abuse."

CLICK HERE TO GET THE OPINION NEWSLETTER

While we won the battle on the earmark fight at the time, as the conference voted to uphold the ban, it appears with this latest spending package that many GOP senators have defied conference rules. Unfortunately, it seems the Washington politician’s addiction to spending knows no bounds.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

I’ve always opposed the waste of your tax dollars, and I’ll continue sounding the alarm and holding the big spenders accountable. The American people deserve to know where their money is going. 

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM SEN. RAND PAUL

Originally published on Fox News.

No Investment Advice

GSI Exchange is a publisher and precious metals retailer. You understand and agree that no content published on the Site constitutes a recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction, or investment strategy is suitable or advisable for any specific person. You understand that the Content on the Site is provided for information purposes only, and none of the information contained on the Site constitutes an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell a security. You understand that the GSI Exchange receives neither monetary or securities compensation for our services. GSI stands to benefit from the sell of retail cost precious metals on this site. To avoid hidden costs all prices are listed live 24/7 on this site. Read the full disclaimer

2022 Info Kit

GET YOUR FREE

GOLD SILVER INFO KIT

Precious Metals and Currency Data Powered by nFusion Solutions