Chat with us, powered by LiveChat

U.S. Treasuries Slush Fund Sends Back Just $41.3 Billion to Fed

Slush Fund
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

EDITOR NOTE: A “dog and pony show.” That’s how the author describes Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin’s handling of the $454 billion CARES Act stimulus. You see, while businesses and households were suffering, many of them on the verge of insolvency, just waiting for that stimulus package from Washington, the Treasury Department failed to deliver most of the funds it pledged. So what did Mnuchin do with the money intended to help small businesses? He placed the majority of it in a slush fund and traded it, according to the author below. That was the portion handed over to the Fed’s emergency lending facility that supposedly went “unused.” Nice trick, sarcastically speaking. Then toward the end of December, when Mnuchin asked for those funds back, the Fed returned almost half the amount only. What’s going on? It may be a complicated matter, but eventually, the truth comes out, as this article shows.

We have become convinced that the allocation of $454 billion under the CARES Act stimulus legislation to cover any losses incurred in the Fed’s emergency bailout programs was a dog and pony show created by U.S. Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin (who has testified to Congress that he helped write the legislation) in order to provide Mnuchin with a slush fund to trade in markets. (See Trump Issued an Executive Memorandum Giving Mnuchin a $50 Billion Slush Fund; Mnuchin Gave Himself $386 Billion More.)

Our suspicions are heightened by the fact that the Fed ran very similar emergency bailout programs from 2007 to 2010 and did not require any funds from the Treasury to backstop losses. The Fed simply relied on collateral from the Wall Street firms borrowing from the Fed. If those firms don’t have the collateral today, then they’re likely insolvent and not legally allowed to borrow from the Fed.

We have carefully reviewed the CARES Act. There is not one word in the legislation that directs Mnuchin to place that $454 billion into the Exchange Stabilization Fund (ESF). But that’s where Mnuchin placed that money. We know this because the ESF’s financial statement says Mnuchin placed not only the $454 billion into the ESF but he also initially placed the additional $46 billion that he was allocated under the CARES Act to help airlines and businesses important to national security (for a total of $500 billion). (See notes to the September 30, 2020 ESF financial statement here.)

Mnuchin has successfully gotten mainstream media to report that the bulk of the $454 billion went to the Fed for its emergency lending facilities but went mostly unused. In reality, the Fed only received $114 billion from Mnuchin. (See Research Arm of Congress Confirms that Mnuchin Never Released Bulk of CARES Act Money Earmarked for Fed’s Emergency Loans.)

Then, on November 19, Mnuchin made a grandstand announcement, issuing a letter to Fed Chairman Jerome Powell demanding that he return any unused funds issued to it by the Treasury for its emergency lending facilities, by December 31, 2020.

Yesterday, the Fed published its H.4.1 weekly financial statement, showing that as of this past Wednesday, January 6, it had returned just $41.3 billion of the paltry $114 billion it had received from the Treasury Secretary. The remaining balance of $72.7 billion from the Treasury is allocated to the following emergency lending facilities: (See footnote 14 to Table 1.)

Commercial Paper Funding Facility: $10 billion

Primary and Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facilities: $13.9 billion

Main Street Loan Facilities: $37.5 billion

Municipal Liquidity Facility: $6.3 billion

Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF): $3.5 billion

Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility: $1.5 billion

Read our full coverage of the Fed’s latest bailout of Wall Street, beginning on September 17, 2019 (months before the pandemic began) here.



Bank Failure Scenario Kit - sm2



  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

All articles are provided as a third party analysis and do not necessarily reflect the explicit views of GSI Exchange and should not be construed as financial advice.

Precious Metals and Currency Data Powered by nFusion Solutions