EDITOR'S NOTE: The hypothetical analogy we’re about to present may seem absurd, but it matches the economic reality we’re currently mired in. Imagine being in a building with no fire alarms but an attending “official” responsible for the safety and well-being of the building’s occupants. You notice early on that the temperature is rising abnormally and that smoke is starting to fill the space. The attending official tells you that it’s a transitory matter and that the issue is being resolved. The fire is isolated, so he says, and is therefore of no threat to anyone’s safety. Then, you see the first sign of flames engulfing the structure. By that time, the official announces that according to the latest observations and analysis, the building is indeed on fire. But, there’s no need to exit too hastily as he (and his committee) may be able to extinguish the flames (a “soft landing”). However, “It’s not going to be easy. And it may well depend, of course, on events that are not under our control” to use Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s words. What’s this all about? The Fed’s GDP tracker is indicating a potential consecutive quarter of negative growth. Its indicating that a recession is more likely than not. For those who had full faith in our hypothetical attending official, it’s a little late, is it not?
- The Atlanta Federal Reserve’s GDPNow tracker is now pointing to an annualized gain of just 0.9% for the second quarter, down from an estimated 1.3% increase less than a week ago.
- With first-quarter growth down 1.5%, a second consecutive quarter of negative growth meets a rule-of-thumb definition for recession.
- The National Bureau of Economic Research, the official arbiter, says a recession can include two straight negative GDP prints, but that’s not necessarily the case.
A widely followed Federal Reserve gauge is indicating that the U.S. economy could be headed for a second consecutive quarter of negative growth, meeting a rule-of-thumb definition for a recession.
In an update posted Tuesday, the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow tracker is now pointing to an annualized gain of just 0.9% for the second quarter.
Following a 1.5% drop in the first three months of the year, the indicator is showing the economy doesn’t have much further to go before it slides into what many consider a recession.
GDPNow follows economic data in real time and uses it to project the way the economy is heading. Tuesday’s data, combined with other recent releases, resulted in the model downgrading what had been an estimate of 1.3% growth as of June 1 to the new outlook for a 0.9% gain.
Personal consumption expenditures, a measure of consumer spending that is responsible for nearly 70% of gross domestic product, saw a cut to a 3.7% gain from a previous 4.4% estimate. Also, real gross private domestic investment now is expected to shave 8.5% off growth, from the previous 8.3%.
At the same time, an improvement to the trade outlook resulted in a mild boost to the estimate.
The U.S. trade deficit with its global partners fell to $87.1 billion in April — still a large number by historical standards but down more than $20 billion from March’s record. On net, trade is expected to subtract 0.13 percentage point from GDP in the second quarter, from a previous estimate of -0.25 percentage point, according to the Atlanta Fed.
Talk of recession has accelerated this year amid surging inflation that has put a damper on corporate profit outlooks. Many on Wall Street are still expecting the combination of resilience in consumer spending and job growth to the keep the U.S. out of recession.
“Right now, it looks like any talk of a recession is a 2023 story. It’s not this year,” said Joseph Brusuelas, chief economist at consulting firm RSM. “We would need to see future shocks to the business cycle. My sense is the economy is going to slow, but only really back to its long-term trend growth rate of 1.8%.”
To be sure, while the notion of two consecutive negative GDP quarters is often considered a recession, that’s not necessarily true.
The National Bureau of Economic Research, the official arbiter of recessions, says that rule of thumb often holds true but not always. For instance, the recession of 2020 saw just one quarter of negative growth.
Instead, the NBER defines a recession as “a significant decline in economic activity that is spread across the economy and that lasts more than a few months.”
“Most of the recessions identified by our procedures do consist of two or more consecutive quarters of declining real GDP, but not all of them,” the NBER says on its site. “There are several reasons. First, we do not identify economic activity solely with real GDP, but consider a range of indicators. Second, we consider the depth of the decline in economic activity.”
However, there has never been a period with consecutive negative-growth quarters that did not entail a recession, according to data going back to 1947.
One major source of inflation fears is the Federal Reserve, which is on a rate-hiking cycle in an effort to quell runaway inflation. Chair Jerome Powell said last month he sees “a good chance to have a soft or softish landing,” even with policy tightening.
“It’s not going to be easy. And it may well depend, of course, on events that are not under our control. But our job is to use our tools to try to achieve that outcome, and that’s what we’re going to do,” Powell said.
Earlier Tuesday, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen told a Senate panel that “bringing inflation down should be our No. 1 priority” and noted that attempts to bring down the cost of living are coming “from a position of strength” in the economy.
Originally published on CNBC.